The temptation to re-read The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas for the umpteenth time was hard to resist. It is a classic novel about revenge, but I put my thinking cap on and looked through my library of books and thought maybe it was about time I found out what Crime and Punishment was all about, as a) it is a classic novel I haven’t read, b) I keep putting off reading it, so this reading challenge is a good excuse to get it over with and c) whilst it is a novel about redemption, it does explore the themes of revenge and guilt…
“A century after it first
appeared, Crime and Punishment remains one of the most gripping
psychological thrillers. A poverty-stricken young man, seeing his family making
sacrifices for him, is faced with an opportunity to solve his financial problems
with one simple but horrifying act: the murder of a pawnbroker. She is, he
feels, just a parasite on society. But does the end justify the means? Rodion
Romanovitch Raskolnikov makes his decision and then has to live with it.
Dostoyevsky, in masterly fashion, contrasts the comedy and tragedy of life in
St. Petersburg with the anguish and turmoil of Raskolnikov's inner life.”
I haven’t tried to read Crime and Punishment before
because it sounds a bit depressing, and I thought it would be a dry and
difficult read. I picked up an Audible copy in a 2-4-1 deal because it didn’t
matter if I never listened to it, as in essence it was free. I’m delighted to
say I really enjoyed both the book and this narration of it. Both Constantine
Gregory’s narration, and Dostoevsky’s unique characters and writing style pull
together, to provide an interesting look into the thoughts and mind of a killer.
This is a long book to listen to, but it clips along at fair
speed to keep the listener engaged, but still slow enough to allow
contemplation about the characters and their motives and actions. It is not
only the protagonist’s actions called into question, but the people around him.
What drives them? Are they ultimately good or bad people?
Meet Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov, an impoverished
student, and the man at the heart of this tale. He has feelings of superiority
over others, but as with all narcissists, he is no better than the other men he
walks amongst. He has accrued debts with a local money lender, Alyona Ivanovna,
and as he walks around his squalid neighbourhood, he has the notion of killing
someone. He is utterly revulsed at this idea, yet the thought will no longer
leave his head. It is said that some people have their best ideas whilst
sitting in a pub, but the same cannot be said for Raskolnikov. He hears the
conversations of the other drinkers; all are wishing that Alyona Ivanovna was
dead.
Sat with various thoughts reeling through his mind, he slips further into a state of drunkenness and becomes motivated by revenge. He is disgusted by the state of poverty surrounding him and how unscrupulous money lenders have caused the problems that face both him and others around him. He convinces himself that if he kills the elderly pawnbroker, he can use the money to make a better society and help others. He will fund a law firm and it will help those like himself. Also, if he kills Ivanovna, he can reclaim his father’s old watch, without the need to find the money to get it back from her.
Once Raskolnikov decides to commit murder, he does so, but
his revenge killing does not go to plan and two murders are committed rather
than one. This forces him to think about what he has done, and soon he is
struggling with the voices in his head and the consequences of his actions.
What would happen if he was found guilty of the murders? What about his own
mortality?
The impetus for killing was to seek revenge for all the
lives ruined by the pawnbroker, it was supposed to make his life better,
easier, but it hasn’t. He can’t use the money he stole; it would look
suspicious. People would want to know where his newfound wealth had come from.
How could he tell his family what he had done? He can’t sell the trinkets he stole;
this would lead him to the door of the authorities who would want to know how
he came about such items.
He feels he is disconnected from friends and family; he
alienates himself from society. This is a period of reflection for him where he
realises that this is no way to live, to be able to live, he must confront what
has happened and resolve his inner conflicts.
Raskolnikov is a surprisingly relatable character. I’m sure
most people have met someone who has caused them such misery in their life that
they wanted to kill them. For most people, this is a fleeting thought that
would never be acted upon, it’s just a way of expressing rage and getting it
out of one’s system, but for the Raskolnikov’s in society, they take those
feelings of rage too far.
He’s a murderer, so you would think he must be bad, but
it’s a more complex situation than that, and so you are drawn into a journey of
trying to reconcile your feelings about such an abhorrent deed. You would think
it an easy task, no-one should condone killing, but Dostoevsky’s superb writing
makes you empathise with Raskolnikov’s difficult situation. The victim, Alyona
Ivanovna, is a loathsome character who profits off the backs of the poor and
takes advantage of her younger sister, treating her like a slave. Raskolnikov
isn’t the only person that wishes Ivanovna were dead. He feels justified
murdering Ivanovna, because she will not be missed, she makes everyone’s life
more miserable than it needs to be.
This seems to be a simple story about a man who has killed
someone, but it is so much more than that. Dostoevsky has done a deep dive into
the minds of people and focused on their internal mental struggles, the descent
into degenerate behaviour, and the aftereffects as a killer comes to terms with
what he has done. This brilliance is what makes Crime and Punishment one
of those landmark pieces of literature that people feel they should read, but
generally never do.
You would be forgiven for thinking this is a dark and bleak
book that belongs in the past, but it is full of dark humour. The book echoes
real life, one of the most absurd things is the human condition and even though
it was written 1866 it is still reflective of modern society. You only need to
pick up a newspaper or switch on the news to hear of fatal stabbings with the implied
justification of ‘he had it coming to him.’
This book is a wonderful psychological thriller which
explores the human desire for destruction, and then the feelings of guilt and
alienation afterwards. According to many studies into the criminal mind,
Dostoevsky has beautifully illustrated the growing guilt many criminals
experience, together with the uncontrollable urge to confess all.
I loved listening to this book and pondering about what was
written. It was interesting hearing what thoughts were whirling around in the Raskolnikov’s
head and why he chose the actions he did, but it was also interesting to hear
the thoughts of his friends. They had their suspicions, and eventually proof of
Raskolnikov’s guilt, so did remaining quiet make them complicit? Were they just
as morally corrupt as Raskolnikov? If we as readers feel sympathy towards Raskolnikov’s
actions, what does that make us?
I found this a really interesting novel, and certainly not
a book that people should be afraid to try reading.
Genre: Fiction, Classics, Russian Literature, Psychological
Release Date: 30th December
2012
Publisher: Naxos Audiobooks
Listening Time: 22h 2m
“Disclosure: If you buy books linked to this
site, I may earn a small commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support
independent bookshops, at no extra cost to you.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.